Title Epidemiological survey of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis isolates in Europe
Author(s) Karen Stevenson1, Linda May1, Susan Denham1, Ian Heron1, Lucia de Juan2, Julio Alvarez2, Gerald Friedrich Gerlach3, Karen Dohmann3, Ivo Pavlik4, Marketa Kopecna4, Peter Willemsen5, Douwe Bakker5, Virginie Thibault6, Franck Biet6, Alastair Greig7.
Institution(s) 1 Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik EH26 0PZ, Scotland, UK; 2 Dpto. Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense, HCV - Planta sótano, Avenida Puerta de Hierro s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain; 3 Institut für Mikrobiologie und Tierseuchen, Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Bischfsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany; 4 Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 32 Brno, Czech Republic; 5 Central Institute for Animal Disease Control (CIDC-Lelystad), CIDC-Lelystad, Edelhertweg 15, 8203 AA Lelystad, The Netherlands; 6 UR 1282, Infectiologie Animale, Santé Publique (IASP-311), INRA centre de Tours, F-37380 Nouzilly, France; 7 Scottish Agricultural College, Veterinary Science Division, Cleeve Gardens, Oakbank Road, Perth, Scotland, UK.
Source Ninth International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis
Section 5: Epidemiology and control strategies
Presentation Oral
Abstract

A panel was assembled of 168 field isolates of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis isolated from 19 different host species from the Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Greece, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain and the United Kingdom. The panel was typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), restriction fragment length polymorphism and hybridisation to IS900 (RFLP-IS900), mycobacterial interspersed repetitive repeats and variable number tandem repeat (MIRU-VNTR) and amplified fragment length polymorphism. A total of 17 BstEII profiles were detected by RFLP-IS900 analysis and the C1 profile was found to be the most predominant in Europe. Thirty one different multiplex PFGE profiles were detected using SnaBI and SpeI and the most widely distributed profile was [2-1]. Twenty five different MIRU-VNTR types were detected with INMV1 and 2 being the most widely disseminated. A few strains were found to be restricted to specific geographic locations although larger numbers are required to determine if this is significant. No evidence was found for species-specific strains and where details were available, wildlife isolates on a single farm were found to be identical to those of cattle on the same farm suggesting interspecies transmission. A comparison of the discriminatory power of the various techniques indicated that PFGE was the most discriminatory followed by MIRU-VNTR and if both of these techniques were combined the discriminatory power was sufficient for epidemiological surveys.


Source: http://www.paratuberculosis.org/pubs/proc9/abst148e_o4.htm

Contact: Click here to Send an inquiry email      Webmaster: Click here to email the webmaster

Copyright © 1999-2009 International Association for Paratuberculosis.